抄作业 / 警告 / Grok Bot

做了什么

Staff (deanrie, 2026-09-05): Documented SuperGrok vs SuperGrok Heavy difference for Grok Bot is linked usage-grant size only—no published latency/queue/tool-speed advantage while in allowance; linking any SuperGrok tier is a usage grant and does not change your Cursor plan (late-August “free Ultra with Heavy” materials are outdated—see Plans and Link SuperGrok help).

场景

社媒排期

资料完整度

• ✓ 作者与原链接有
• ✓ 做了什么有
• ✓ 来源原文摘录有
• — 截图 / 媒体来源未提供
• — 步骤 / 章节来源未提供
• — 提示词 / 配置原文来源未提供
• — 结果 / 数字来源未提供
• ✓ 风险提示有
• ✓ 相关条目有

— 表示来源没有给出，本站不补写。

来源原文摘录

We’re comparing SuperGrok with SuperGrok Heavy specifically for Grok Bot—the autonomous agent with its own computer, routines and connectors—not Grok chat or its Heavy mode. We contacted support and received a reply from Cursor’s AI Support Assistant stating that: • Both plans use the same first-party models, and Heavy does not add a more capable Bot model, extra reasoning compute or multi-agent mode. • There is “no documented lower latency, priority processing, or faster tool/computer execution” on Heavy while both accounts remain within their allowances. • Heavy’s documented advantage is a

展开全文

larger linked usage grant. The reply linked to: • Plans and billing • Link SuperGrok for Grok Bot That is helpful. We’re looking for clarification on actual internal behavior and firsthand experience, rather than another comparison of published usage allowances. …

摘自论坛首帖，照录原文，未翻译。

提示词

来源没有给出可直接复制的提示词原文。

怎么复制

1. 读原文：forum.cursor.com ↗
2. 把原文里的步骤/提示词整理成一条消息交给 Bot
3. 先手动跑一次，再决定频率

风险与限制

• 这是一条额度/故障反馈（警告），不是可复制的作业。
• 定时运行会持续消耗额度：频率从低开始，跑稳再加
• 作者的结果不保证能复现，以原帖为准

用量预估

用金属计算器估一下