抄作业 / 警告 / Grok Bot
Which Grok Bot usage counts against the weekly pool?
标题与摘要为原文,未翻译。
- 做了什么
- Staff (deanrie, 2026-09-07): chats, routines, browser/computer use, shell, sub-agents, MCP, and bot-machine repo work draw the weekly Grok Bot pool (grok-bot-* rows); helper model names without the prefix can still be Grok Bot metering until that pool is exhausted.
- 资料完整度
- 作者与原链接有
- 做了什么有
- 来源原文摘录有
- 截图 / 媒体来源未提供
- 步骤 / 章节来源未提供
- 提示词 / 配置原文来源未提供
- 结果 / 数字来源未提供
- 风险提示有
- 相关条目有
— 表示来源没有给出,本站不补写。
- 来源原文摘录
Can Cursor clarify exactly which Grok Bot usage counts against the weekly pool vs Cursor Models / Other Models? I’m trying to understand the exact quota/billing behavior of Grok Bot, because there have been several official explanations that appear to overlap or contradict each other. From what I understand, the following has now been officially stated: 1. Normal Grok Bot conversations use the separate Grok Bot weekly pool. Cursor staff has said multiple times that normal Grok Bot usage has its own weekly allowance and should not consume the regular Cursor Models / Other Models monthly
展开全文
allowance. 2. On September 3, Mohit clarified that routines/automations and browser actions are different. The explanation was: • Conversations → Grok Bot weekly pool • Routines / automations → Cursor plan / Other Models • Browser actions / cloud-agent work → Cursor plan / Other Models …RongleCat/awesome-grok-bot (GitHub) · 打开原文 ↗ 摘自论坛首帖,照录原文,未翻译。
- 提示词
来源没有给出可直接复制的提示词原文。
- 怎么复制
- 读原文:forum.cursor.com ↗
- 把原文里的步骤/提示词整理成一条消息交给 Bot
- 先手动跑一次,再决定频率
- 风险与限制
- 这是一条额度/故障反馈(警告),不是可复制的作业。
- 用到浏览器或网页登录:最耗额度,能用 connector 就别开浏览器
- 定时运行会持续消耗额度:频率从低开始,跑稳再加
- 作者的结果不保证能复现,以原帖为准
- 用量预估
- 用金属计算器估一下