抄作业 / 做成了什么 / OpenAI Dots

做了什么

作者认为 Dot 最佳用法不是私人助理，而是在一个对话里说明目标，让 Dot 去提示并跟进 Codex 各项目里的多个线程，减少决策疲劳。

场景

写代码上线

资料完整度

• ✓ 作者与原链接有
• ✓ 做了什么有
• ✓ 来源原文摘录有
• ✓ 截图 / 媒体有
• — 步骤 / 章节来源未提供
• — 提示词 / 配置原文来源未提供
• — 结果 / 数字来源未提供
• ✓ 风险提示有
• ✓ 相关条目有

— 表示来源没有给出，本站不补写。

作者原话

I WAS WRONG about ChatGPT Dots !! 😭

I thought it’s like another Muse or Grokbot

But it fits my workflow and unlocks a whole new level of productivity MUCH BETTER

Instead of using it as a personal assistant (which grokbot and muse excel at already), here’s how to unlock Dot’s best use case:

Have it orchestrate all your work sessions on Codex

Codex unlike Grokbot and Muse have PROJECTS. Folders that contain threads / sessions.

展开全文

Dots being powered by Astra means it’s exceptional at prompting and guiding your projects.

So instead of you promoting 10 different threads or sessions in 5 different sessions….

I find it so much easier to tell my Dot my desires and goals in ONE CHAT and it ends up prompting those threads even better than how I would’ve prompted and just takes out all the decision fatigue.

It continually prompts them and follows up on the progress as well.

All you have to do is just look at one chat with your Dot, and anytime you want, you can jump into those new or existing threads/codex sessions and take over.

What a time to be alive.

Here’s what I personally prefer grokbot for:

#grokbot #ai #dots #chatgpt

作者原话，照录原文，未翻译。

效果截图

提示词

来源没有给出可直接复制的提示词原文。

怎么复制

1. 读原文：x.com ↗
2. 把原文里的步骤/提示词整理成一条消息交给 Bot
3. 先手动跑一次，再决定频率

风险与限制

• 作者的结果不保证能复现，以原帖为准

用量预估

用金属计算器估一下