常驻用量

抄作业 / 对比 / 多产品

三款 agent 能否搞定韩国网站:23 份报告汇总

做了什么
作者把 23 份公开报告整理成「服务 × agent」表:Coupang 上 Muse 3 次中 2 次被拦,Grok Bot 2 成 2 拦;在海外云浏览器运行的 agent 18 例中 9 例被拦,常卡在机器人或海外 IP 检测;Naver 据称不向外部 agent 开放购物数据。
场景
周报 / 简报 盯 PR / 仓库 购物比价
资料完整度
  • 作者与原链接有
  • 做了什么有
  • 来源原文摘录有
  • 截图 / 媒体有
  • 步骤 / 章节来源未提供
  • 提示词 / 配置原文来源未提供
  • 结果 / 数字有
  • 风险提示有
  • 相关条目有

— 表示来源没有给出,本站不补写。

作者原话
Can Grok Bot, ChatGPT agent or Meta Muse actually get things done on the Korean internet?

Korea mostly runs on its own platforms (Coupang, Naver, Kakao), so I put 23 public reports and news items into one table: service × agent.

What it shows so far:

• Coupang: Muse was blocked in 2 of 3 reports. Grok Bot is split, 2 worked and 2 blocked. One success involved logging into Coupang on the bot's cloud computer and typing in a payment PIN.
• Agents that run in an overseas cloud browser (Muse, Grok Bot, ChatGPT agent) were reported blocked in 9 of 18 cases, often at bot or overseas-IP checks.
•
展开全文 Naver reportedly doesn't let outside agents into its shopping data.
• Agents running in your own logged-in browser fare differently: one user had Claude in Chrome fill in a Korean tax return, then clicked submit himself.

Each service also lists what you hand over before you try. Short version: keep your payment PIN and certificates to yourself, and press the final pay button yourself.

Tried an agent on a Korean site? Send it my way.
@echo12yj · · 在 X 打开 ↗

作者原话,照录原文,未翻译。

效果截图
原帖截图
截图来自原帖
提示词

来源没有给出可直接复制的提示词原文。

怎么复制
  1. 读原文:x.com ↗
  2. 把原文里的步骤/提示词整理成一条消息交给 Bot
  3. 先手动跑一次,再决定频率
风险与限制
  • 涉及付款、下单或预订:先让 Bot 只起草,确认后再执行
  • 用到浏览器或网页登录:最耗额度,能用 connector 就别开浏览器
  • 作者的结果不保证能复现,以原帖为准
用量预估
用金属计算器估一下