抄作业 / 对比 / OpenAI Dots

做了什么

他认为 Dots 和 Grok Bot 争的是工作任务、Muse 是个人任务；Dots 最大优势是住在 ChatGPT 里、上手无缝，适合散步时打电话问「今天该处理什么」再分派给其他线程；但在 App 里聊天难分清在回哪件事，产品堆太多对普通用户不友好。

场景

写代码上线

资料完整度

• ✓ 作者与原链接有
• ✓ 做了什么有
• ✓ 来源原文摘录有
• — 截图 / 媒体来源未提供
• — 步骤 / 章节来源未提供
• — 提示词 / 配置原文来源未提供
• — 结果 / 数字来源未提供
• ✓ 风险提示有
• ✓ 相关条目有

— 表示来源没有给出，本站不补写。

作者原话

Here's my take on OpenAI dots vs. the other personal agents:

1. These are really two separate races. dots and Grok Bot are going after work tasks. Muse is going after personal tasks. So I don't think dots competes directly with Muse.

2. Dots' biggest advantage is that it lives inside ChatGPT. My onboarding was seamless because everything was already connected. And with my ChatGPT memory and Astra behind it, it answers big questions like "What should I do to grow my business?" better than other agents.

展开全文

3. I also think of dots as ChatGPT's official chief of staff agent. My favorite way to use it is to call it on a walk, ask "What should I take care of today?", then have it hand work off to my other ChatGPT threads.

4. In contrast, chatting with my dot in the app is a worse experience. Since it's juggling several tasks at once, it's hard to tell which one it's responding to. I prefer Grok Bot (where each bot works on one thing at a time) or talking to my dot in Slack (which has more obvious conversation threading).

5. I'm a broken record about this, but cramming Codex, Work, dots, Spaces, Pages, and more all into ChatGPT is overwhelming. My hunch is everyone at OpenAI is agent-pilled, so it's hard to take a step back and think about how casual users will learn all this stuff. This is the biggest gap imo - OpenAI needs to think a lot harder about onboarding for normal users. My mom will have no idea how to use any of this.

📌 I talk more about all this in my full dots review and tutorial here: https://t.co/kUtg3RPk7l

作者原话，照录原文，未翻译。

提示词

来源没有给出可直接复制的提示词原文。

怎么复制

1. 读原文：x.com ↗
2. 把原文里的步骤/提示词整理成一条消息交给 Bot
3. 先手动跑一次，再决定频率

风险与限制

• 作者的结果不保证能复现，以原帖为准

用量预估

用金属计算器估一下